Housing Advocacy

A Boost to Vouchers Would Be a Boost for Kids

More than 5 million people in 2.1 million low-income families use the Housing Choice Voucher program to help pay for housing that they find in the private market. Expanding and […]

More than 5 million people in 2.1 million low-income families use the Housing Choice Voucher program to help pay for housing that they find in the private market. Expanding and improving the program could boost poor children’s prospects: studies show that these vouchers reduce homelessness and that living in stable housing is linked to better long-term educational and health achievement among poor children.

But the Housing Choice Voucher program falls short in two important ways. First, its reach is limited. Only about one in four low-income families eligible for rental assistance receives it (see chart). Second, families often have a difficult time in using their vouchers to move to significantly less-poor neighborhoods—areas where there are more jobs, better schools, and/or less crime.


In congressional testimony last month, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities President Robert Greenstein recommended ways to increase the voucher program’s effectiveness and efficiency.

Modify policies to increase families’ ability to use vouchers to live in safer communities. Congress should encourage the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to make these changes, Greenstein told the House Budget Committee, noting:

[I]n metropolitan areas where vouchers are

concentrated in poorer neighborhoods, HUD could set

the Fair Market Rents on which the voucher subsidy

levels are based at the zip code level, rather than using

the same rent limits across an entire metropolitan

area, which ignores the fact that rents can vary widely

across a metro area. Such a reform would increase

housing opportunities in ‘opportunity neighborhoods’

without increasing federal costs. In addition… HUD

could reward agencies that succeed at enabling more

families to use their vouchers in high-opportunity areas.

Restructure program administration. HUD contracts with 2,300 separate public housing agencies (PHAs) to administer the Housing Choice Voucher program, which undermines the program’s effectiveness and increases costs. Greenstein outlined a few possible improvements, including:

  • Encouraging the formation of consortia of PHAs in a geographic area. HUD should revise rules to reduce administrative burdens and provide incentives for agencies that form consortia. If HUD enters into a single voucher funding contract with the agencies in a consortium, “portability” barriers would be eliminated and families could use their vouchers to move seamlessly within the entire service area.
  • Ceasing to pay for inefficiency. Under current funding formulas, HUD provides an incentive for agencies to remain small rather than to form consortia. We estimate the program could save about $40 million per year just by eliminating the higher per-voucher fee that agencies receive if they administer 600 or fewer vouchers.
  • Placing poor performing agencies on a shorter leash. HUD has the authority to take over administration of poorly performing programs and consolidate them with a willing, well-managed PHA. HUD could strengthen its performance assessment tools and use available remedies in response to poor performance to foster the formation of larger, more effective and efficient local programs.

Related Articles