Policy

Linked Deposits

In 2009, in Pittsburgh, a city much admired for its bank/CDC collaborations, the lender for a prominent mixed commercial/residential project was requiring new appraisals and changing loan terms, which added […]

In 2009, in Pittsburgh, a city much admired for its bank/CDC collaborations, the lender for a prominent mixed commercial/residential project was requiring new appraisals and changing loan terms, which added significant costs to the transaction. The city had to provide additional capital to keep the project alive. Subsequently, the city shifted $8 million of its deposits away from that national bank to a locally headquartered regional bank that had an excellent track record of financing Pittsburgh CDC projects.

Credit crunch experiences like this have energized community activists to revisit linked deposit initiatives popularized in the early 1990s. In the 1990s, Peter Dreier (NHI board member, now a professor at Occidental College) convinced then-mayor of Boston, Ray Flynn, to create a review commission that issued an annual report card on how well banks were meeting the lending needs of Boston neighborhoods. While the report card was focused on access to municipal deposits, banks became additionally sensitive to the potential for negative media coverage.

As part of its 10% is Enough campaign, in 2010, the Greater Boston Interfaith Organization convinced the outgoing state treasurer (and gubernatorial candidate) Timothy Cahill to announce a new campaign to confront and transfer state deposits away from national banks that were perceived as offering credit terms at rates inconsistent with state usury caps. Sister organizations are seeking similar commitments in other states. The new treasurer, Steve Grossman, (former chairman of the Democratic National Committee), recently issued a “linked deposit”-oriented RFP for smaller, community banks to attract state deposits through the $100 million Small Banking Partnership program, which incentivizes increased lending to local, job-creating entrepreneurs.

Such pressure may continue to be a good idea in the current climate, as long as advocates develop priorities that are achievable and can be monitored in a transparent manner.

Related Articles

  • About 25 people in three ragged rows, outdoors under a tree, with houses across the street behind them. They are of mixed ages, genders, and skin tones, and all are smiling. Many hold posterboard signs, some of which read "People Over Profit/Greedy Landlords," "Build Tenant Power," "Support the Bleecker Terrace Tenants Association," and "Capital Crossing/2nd most Code Violations in Albany." Other signs are not legible.

    In Upstate New York, the Fight for Good Cause Continues

    July 12, 2024

    This week, Ithaca became the latest city to opt into New York’s new Good Cause Eviction Law. What are tenant organizers doing to make the law work better for their communities?

  • How Policy Can Help Tenants Purchase Their Homes, a Webinar

    July 3, 2024

    Laws that give tenants the ability to purchase their own apartments are popping up across the country. In this webinar, a panel of folks who have been reporting on, fighting for, and using these policies offer their perspectives on this powerful anti-displacement tool. 

  • TOPA Needs Capital to Succeed

    July 2, 2024

    TOPA helps prevent displacement and build tenant power in D.C. Affordable capital is critical to its success.